Their is a lobby group aggressively lobbying to allow banks to repay the TARP money? Seriously? We need a lobby group to allow the banks to repay the money? What is going on in our government that is making them not want the loan paid off. I know they don't have to be logical because it is not their money.
Oh yes! They won't control the banks who don't owe us money. Good idea, we want all businesses to be beholden to the government who has failed to create anything but debt.
"Industry groups, like the American Bankers Association, have lobbied aggressively to allow the banks to repay the money quickly, saying it would send a positive signal to depositors and investors that the nation’s banks were sound." (http://www.cnbc.com/id/29991226)
Don't worry American people. When I say the banks are paying back what they took, WE THE PEOPLE aren't getting paid back. "The returned money could be used for other Treasury programs." (http://www.cnbc.com/id/29991226) 'Could' always means 'will' when it comes to screwing up the country and spending our money.
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Monday, March 9, 2009
EXPLANATION OF ACORN AND NWRO's CLOWARD-PIVEN
To get an idea of where I am today. I have just finished watching the movie "Expelled" by Ben Stein (about the corruption in the scientific community), watching a History Channel show about Albert Einstein (who felt the effect of being rejected by the scientific community) and reading a news article about Global Warming where Al Gore says the science has been settled on it so stop asking questions. (Article about scientists rejecting the idea that the science is settled.)
The history and role of the radical socialist's agenda. Why we don't like this agenda. Don't be fooled by Obama's sweet talking rhetoric. He just reinstated his comments about re-distributing wealth.
This next article explains further how entitlements spending is meant to overwhelm the capitalist system and create such a crisis that we will let the government do whatever they'd like to us. They've pretty much got us to that point already, anyway.
To get an idea of who Saul Alinsky is trying to emulate, this is a quote from him written in the acknowledgment section of his book, Rules for Radicals (1971). "Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins-or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom--Lucifer."
Yes, Lucifer is a great example of how to gain power in exchange for an eternity of misery. Lucifer's great idea was to take others freedom away and then take all the glory for making them live the way he made them. Sounds like socialism/communism.
The history and role of the radical socialist's agenda. Why we don't like this agenda. Don't be fooled by Obama's sweet talking rhetoric. He just reinstated his comments about re-distributing wealth.
This next article explains further how entitlements spending is meant to overwhelm the capitalist system and create such a crisis that we will let the government do whatever they'd like to us. They've pretty much got us to that point already, anyway.
To get an idea of who Saul Alinsky is trying to emulate, this is a quote from him written in the acknowledgment section of his book, Rules for Radicals (1971). "Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins-or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom--Lucifer."
Yes, Lucifer is a great example of how to gain power in exchange for an eternity of misery. Lucifer's great idea was to take others freedom away and then take all the glory for making them live the way he made them. Sounds like socialism/communism.
Friday, March 6, 2009
The Communist Party of America Chooses Obama
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=88380
This is an article about Sam Webb, the Chairman of the Communist Party in the United States. This is an article about his support for Barack Obama. He now has a "friend and an ally in the White House".
This video link is Sam Webb on Glenn Beck saying that Communism is successful and Capitalism fails. He gives 1.9% of his annual salary to charity. That charity goes to his own communist newspaper. He criticised Glenn Beck for being wealthy and called him a pig at the trough. Glenn Beck gives 20% of his salary to charity.
The people who fight for control of the people, rarely care about the people, but they always care about themselves. Dirty communists are the only pigs. Take what's not theirs and then they claim success while the masses beg for bread outside of their dictator's large palaces.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is also happy that Obama is on the brink of socialism. He spoke to his people in Caracas today and said referring to Obama and America, "Come with us, align yourself, come with us on the road to socialism. This is the only path. Imagine a socialist revolution in the United States."
I know we're all a bunch of crazies who think Obama policies, friends and attitude are pushing us to a world of socialism. I would rather be free and crazy than a crazy slave to the government and their social programs.
This is an article about Sam Webb, the Chairman of the Communist Party in the United States. This is an article about his support for Barack Obama. He now has a "friend and an ally in the White House".
This video link is Sam Webb on Glenn Beck saying that Communism is successful and Capitalism fails. He gives 1.9% of his annual salary to charity. That charity goes to his own communist newspaper. He criticised Glenn Beck for being wealthy and called him a pig at the trough. Glenn Beck gives 20% of his salary to charity.
The people who fight for control of the people, rarely care about the people, but they always care about themselves. Dirty communists are the only pigs. Take what's not theirs and then they claim success while the masses beg for bread outside of their dictator's large palaces.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is also happy that Obama is on the brink of socialism. He spoke to his people in Caracas today and said referring to Obama and America, "Come with us, align yourself, come with us on the road to socialism. This is the only path. Imagine a socialist revolution in the United States."
I know we're all a bunch of crazies who think Obama policies, friends and attitude are pushing us to a world of socialism. I would rather be free and crazy than a crazy slave to the government and their social programs.
Obama's Response to reporters who disagree with him.
A couple days ago I posted an article written by David Brooks. After that article became so popular,the white house was enraged that he would write such a critical article. Four top Obama officials contacted Mr. Brooks to get him to write an article supportive of the president. He writes about their conversation in todays article. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/06/opinion/06brooks.html?_r=1
The way Mr Brooks rolled over and took it in the shorts really has given me disdain for him. Like most people who are confronted with the (rules for radical team) Obama administration, they soon learn they are a bunch of thugs not to be messed with. They will call attention to you, send the leaders out to tell you that you are wrong and will attack if you don't change your mind. Mr. Brooks does just that. He doesn't ask the thugs the questions that matter, he doesn't question the premise of their reasoning, and he doesn't call them out when they blatantly lie.
For instance, why has the Obama team decided that getting rid of entitlements will consist of Social Security and call that reform. People on social security paid into social security (a savings accounts of sorts for people) to be able to get social security. What about welfare, where the people pay nothing into it and do nothing as a way to receive it. Why do the thugs not care about reforming that (true) entitlement program. Is it because Barack Obama said that his goal is to create reparations for black people? Since a very large percentage of the people on welfare are black compared to their total population, he will be able to accomplish his goal. (Total US Population is 12.8% black, 80% white, Total US welfare recipients are 37.2% Black, 38.8% White.) This isn't meant to be an attack on black people, but an attack on Barack's policies.
My next problem with the Obama team is that they keep saying government is going to get smaller. How can they say that since they have developed several new government agencies and now have many businesses (banks, insurance, auto). How can it get smaller? When you have the disgusting whore hiring X NY Democratic Governor Eliot Spitzer (who made it a point to heavily punish anyone who bought sex, but got off with just a slap on the wrist himself) who has just purchased a large commercial building in Washington D.C., saying "The government isn't going to be shrinking as a force in our economy. The relevance of government in the economy is growing not shrinking. The fundamental business of this city is growing" (Alex Frangos, Wall Street Journal 3/6/09). At least he was willing to put money where his mouth is.
How does the Obama administration so easily spread lies and feel like we are too stupid to catch on. Rules for Radicals. They must believe we have short memories. He is consistently saying the opposite of what he means.
The way Mr Brooks rolled over and took it in the shorts really has given me disdain for him. Like most people who are confronted with the (rules for radical team) Obama administration, they soon learn they are a bunch of thugs not to be messed with. They will call attention to you, send the leaders out to tell you that you are wrong and will attack if you don't change your mind. Mr. Brooks does just that. He doesn't ask the thugs the questions that matter, he doesn't question the premise of their reasoning, and he doesn't call them out when they blatantly lie.
For instance, why has the Obama team decided that getting rid of entitlements will consist of Social Security and call that reform. People on social security paid into social security (a savings accounts of sorts for people) to be able to get social security. What about welfare, where the people pay nothing into it and do nothing as a way to receive it. Why do the thugs not care about reforming that (true) entitlement program. Is it because Barack Obama said that his goal is to create reparations for black people? Since a very large percentage of the people on welfare are black compared to their total population, he will be able to accomplish his goal. (Total US Population is 12.8% black, 80% white, Total US welfare recipients are 37.2% Black, 38.8% White.) This isn't meant to be an attack on black people, but an attack on Barack's policies.
My next problem with the Obama team is that they keep saying government is going to get smaller. How can they say that since they have developed several new government agencies and now have many businesses (banks, insurance, auto). How can it get smaller? When you have the disgusting whore hiring X NY Democratic Governor Eliot Spitzer (who made it a point to heavily punish anyone who bought sex, but got off with just a slap on the wrist himself) who has just purchased a large commercial building in Washington D.C., saying "The government isn't going to be shrinking as a force in our economy. The relevance of government in the economy is growing not shrinking. The fundamental business of this city is growing" (Alex Frangos, Wall Street Journal 3/6/09). At least he was willing to put money where his mouth is.
How does the Obama administration so easily spread lies and feel like we are too stupid to catch on. Rules for Radicals. They must believe we have short memories. He is consistently saying the opposite of what he means.
Monday, March 2, 2009
Obama Policies don't sit well with the Market
This is an article found in the Wall Street Journal Opinion Section. It is a well written explanation of where we are right now.
"As 2009 opened, three weeks before Barack Obama took office, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 9034 on January 2, its highest level since the autumn panic. Yesterday the Dow fell another 4.24% to 6763, for an overall decline of 25% in two months and to its lowest level since 1997. The dismaying message here is that President Obama's policies have become part of the economy's problem.
Americans have welcomed the Obama era in the same spirit of hope the President campaigned on. But after five weeks in office, it's become clear that Mr. Obama's policies are slowing, if not stopping, what would otherwise be the normal process of economic recovery. From punishing business to squandering scarce national public resources, Team Obama is creating more uncertainty and less confidence -- and thus a longer period of recession or subpar growth."
Read the full article here.
"So what has happened in the last two months? The economy has received no great new outside shock. Exchange rates and other prices have been stable, and there are no security crises of note. The reality of a sharp recession has been known and built into stock prices since last year's fourth quarter.
What is new is the unveiling of Mr. Obama's agenda and his approach to governance. Every new President has a finite stock of capital -- financial and political -- to deploy, and amid recession Mr. Obama has more than most. But one negative revelation has been the way he has chosen to spend his scarce resources on income transfers rather than growth promotion. Most of his "stimulus" spending was devoted to social programs, rather than public works, and nearly all of the tax cuts were devoted to income maintenance rather than to improving incentives to work or invest.
His Treasury has been making a similar mistake with its financial bailout plans. The banking system needs to work through its losses, and one necessary use of public capital is to assist in burning down those bad assets as fast as possible. Yet most of Team Obama's ministrations so far have gone toward triage and life support, rather than repair and recovery."
"As 2009 opened, three weeks before Barack Obama took office, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 9034 on January 2, its highest level since the autumn panic. Yesterday the Dow fell another 4.24% to 6763, for an overall decline of 25% in two months and to its lowest level since 1997. The dismaying message here is that President Obama's policies have become part of the economy's problem.
Americans have welcomed the Obama era in the same spirit of hope the President campaigned on. But after five weeks in office, it's become clear that Mr. Obama's policies are slowing, if not stopping, what would otherwise be the normal process of economic recovery. From punishing business to squandering scarce national public resources, Team Obama is creating more uncertainty and less confidence -- and thus a longer period of recession or subpar growth."
Read the full article here.
"So what has happened in the last two months? The economy has received no great new outside shock. Exchange rates and other prices have been stable, and there are no security crises of note. The reality of a sharp recession has been known and built into stock prices since last year's fourth quarter.
What is new is the unveiling of Mr. Obama's agenda and his approach to governance. Every new President has a finite stock of capital -- financial and political -- to deploy, and amid recession Mr. Obama has more than most. But one negative revelation has been the way he has chosen to spend his scarce resources on income transfers rather than growth promotion. Most of his "stimulus" spending was devoted to social programs, rather than public works, and nearly all of the tax cuts were devoted to income maintenance rather than to improving incentives to work or invest.
His Treasury has been making a similar mistake with its financial bailout plans. The banking system needs to work through its losses, and one necessary use of public capital is to assist in burning down those bad assets as fast as possible. Yet most of Team Obama's ministrations so far have gone toward triage and life support, rather than repair and recovery."
Moderates are Deserting Obama's Policies
This is an article written by David Brooks, a moderate, who supported Obama in the campaign and now is realizing the monster he has voted for.
"Those of us who consider ourselves moderates — moderate-conservative, in my case — are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is not who we thought he was. His words are responsible; his character is inspiring. But his actions betray a transformational liberalism that should put every centrist on notice. As Clive Crook, an Obama admirer, wrote in The Financial Times, the Obama budget “contains no trace of compromise. It makes no gesture, however small, however costless to its larger agenda, of a bipartisan approach to the great questions it addresses. It is a liberal’s dream of a new New Deal.”
"Those of us who consider ourselves moderates — moderate-conservative, in my case — are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is not who we thought he was. His words are responsible; his character is inspiring. But his actions betray a transformational liberalism that should put every centrist on notice. As Clive Crook, an Obama admirer, wrote in The Financial Times, the Obama budget “contains no trace of compromise. It makes no gesture, however small, however costless to its larger agenda, of a bipartisan approach to the great questions it addresses. It is a liberal’s dream of a new New Deal.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
