Obama's Response to reporters who disagree with him.

A couple days ago I posted an article written by David Brooks. After that article became so popular,the white house was enraged that he would write such a critical article. Four top Obama officials contacted Mr. Brooks to get him to write an article supportive of the president. He writes about their conversation in todays article. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/06/opinion/06brooks.html?_r=1

The way Mr Brooks rolled over and took it in the shorts really has given me disdain for him. Like most people who are confronted with the (rules for radical team) Obama administration, they soon learn they are a bunch of thugs not to be messed with. They will call attention to you, send the leaders out to tell you that you are wrong and will attack if you don't change your mind. Mr. Brooks does just that. He doesn't ask the thugs the questions that matter, he doesn't question the premise of their reasoning, and he doesn't call them out when they blatantly lie.

For instance, why has the Obama team decided that getting rid of entitlements will consist of Social Security and call that reform. People on social security paid into social security (a savings accounts of sorts for people) to be able to get social security. What about welfare, where the people pay nothing into it and do nothing as a way to receive it. Why do the thugs not care about reforming that (true) entitlement program. Is it because Barack Obama said that his goal is to create reparations for black people? Since a very large percentage of the people on welfare are black compared to their total population, he will be able to accomplish his goal. (Total US Population is 12.8% black, 80% white, Total US welfare recipients are 37.2% Black, 38.8% White.) This isn't meant to be an attack on black people, but an attack on Barack's policies.

My next problem with the Obama team is that they keep saying government is going to get smaller. How can they say that since they have developed several new government agencies and now have many businesses (banks, insurance, auto). How can it get smaller? When you have the disgusting whore hiring X NY Democratic Governor Eliot Spitzer (who made it a point to heavily punish anyone who bought sex, but got off with just a slap on the wrist himself) who has just purchased a large commercial building in Washington D.C., saying "The government isn't going to be shrinking as a force in our economy. The relevance of government in the economy is growing not shrinking. The fundamental business of this city is growing" (Alex Frangos, Wall Street Journal 3/6/09). At least he was willing to put money where his mouth is.

How does the Obama administration so easily spread lies and feel like we are too stupid to catch on. Rules for Radicals. They must believe we have short memories. He is consistently saying the opposite of what he means.